Hamlet, By William Shakespeare - 1691 Words

Many people base their lives on the uncertainty they place around themselves. Thus causing many problems with being able to guarantee anything in day to day life. Is it certain that one will arrive to a destination unharmed? Can anyone’s safety be guaranteed? This same problem can be seen in the play Hamlet, by William Shakespeare. Hamlet’s whole life is based on uncertain ideas and in the end it collapses on him, as if he built a house on shifting sands. If there was no uncertainty in Hamlet, There would be no story line. As soon as Hamlet was told to kill Claudius, he would have killed him and avenged the murder, but because of the uncertainty he has to find out for certain what has arisen. In order to reduce uncertainty, one must ultimately research and deduce life’s choices. One is able to see where Hamlet struggles with uncertainty when he questions the reliability of the ghost, death, and the afterlife. A ghost can be deceitful, much like citizens that obtain information from misleading sources. Whether this is forming an opinion from an overheard conversation, or an article read from a paper, there is more research required to solidify one’s viewpoint. The same could be said about the ghost in Hamlet because in the book, The Greenwood Companion To Shakespeare: A Comprehensive Guide For Students, Rosenblum states, â€Å"His appearance is so ambiguous that not only Hamlet but also generations of scholars have questioned his authenticity.†(738). Hamlet knows of no reasons toShow MoreRelatedHamlet, By William Shakespeare880 Words   |  4 PagesWilliam Shakespeare is praised as the pioneering English poet and playwright whose collection of theatrical works is regarded as the greatest artistic value throughout the history of English literature. Shakespeare delved into the spiritual and mental component of humanity and the consequences that arise from this human spirit whe n it is disputed. The most famous revenge tragedy play, Hamlet, is an excellent illustration of Shakespeare’s philosophical study of human nature. In Hamlet, the arguableRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare899 Words   |  4 PagesWilliam Shakespeare, author of Hamlet, was a well-known author in the 1500s and is still popular today. He was born on April 24, 1564 in London, England. Although there were no birth records at that time, it shows he was baptized one year prior to that, which leads us to believe his birthday was in 1564 because children were normally baptized a year after their birth. Shakespeare’s writing style was very different than others at that time. He used many metaphors and rhetorical phrases, and most ofRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare996 Words   |  4 PagesHamlet, written by William Shakespeare, with out a doubt holds the most famous soliloquy in English history spoken by Hamlet in Act III, scene i, lines 57-90. This soliloquy holds m uch importance to the play as a whole because it ties together the reoccurring themes of suicide and Hamlet’s inaction portrayed by Shakespeare. Hamlet poses a problem, which is the driving force of the play: â€Å"To be or not to be?†(III.i.57). Shakespeare uses this logical question asked by Hamlet to drive out his underlyingRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare1178 Words   |  5 Pages In William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, the protagonist suffers from struggles with major characters, especially with the women in his life. While reading the play Hamlet, Hamlet appears to be a disillusioned man. Throughout the play, Shakespeare has only casted two females: Gertrude and Ophelia. Gertrude is defined to be incestuous, naà ¯ve and cold-hearted. On the other side, Ophelia is characterized to be ignorant, innocent and fearful. After the quick marriage of his mother and evil uncle, Hamlet’sRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare1308 Words   |  6 PagesHamlet is arguably one of the greatest tragedies in all of literature and when most people think of tragic plays, they think of none other than the one who wrote it, William Shakespeare. This classic story of revenge excites it’s readers with its main character, Prince Hamlet, who goes through the unique human-like process of revenge that is often overlooked. Many other stories rely heavily on the logi c of good people doing good things and bad people doing bad things just for the sake of their natureRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare Essay1453 Words   |  6 PagesHamlet by William Shakespeare explores many aspects of mankind--death, betrayal, love, and mourning. Out of these, the most prominent theme in this play is death in the form of suicide. The main character, Hamlet, finds himself questioning the quality of life and the uncertainty of the afterlife once he discovers news of his father s death and the corruption in the kingdom that follows. Ophelia, Hamlet’s lover, is found dead later in the plot and is presumed to have committed suicide. In Hamlet’sRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare1146 Words   |  5 PagesA character so complex, enticing and fascinating, his name is Hamlet. We are all Hamlet, and that, is the argument. Hamlet is an enigmatic character with many flaws. These flaws are the ones that prove similarities between us and him. A play so popular and significant is due to its huge relevance to us as a society. In the play Hamlet, William Shakespeare uses Hamlet’s character and metaphor to demonstrate that when one is left alone to their thoughts, these thoughts overtake reason. ConsequentlyRead MoreHamlet by William Shakespeare1456 Words   |  6 PagesThe play Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, takes place in a time where the impossible was a part of the lives of everyday people. Occurrences that people in the modern time would believe unbelievable. Yet, with just a quill and parchment Shakespeare’s is able to connect the past and present by weaving a plot with skill that is still unparalleled to this day. The play Hamlet this exceeds this expectation by revealing depth of Hamlets, the protagonists, character personality through the useRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare1920 Words   |  8 PagesIn the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, the character Hamlet must deal with both external and internal conflict. Hamlet encounters many struggles and has trouble finding a way to deal with them. With so many corrupt people in his life, Hamlet feels as if there is no one that he can trust and begins to isolate himself from others. A result from this isolation leads Hamlet to become melancholy. Hamlet struggles with suicidal thoughts, wants to kill King Claudius, and is distraught over his mother’sRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare900 Words   |  4 PagesIn this story Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, there was an excessive deal of questions surrounding Hamlet’s mental state. Claudius’s nephew hadn’t been the same since his father passed away. It’s been up for discussion as if he’s actually senseless surrounding the death, or the wedding between his mom and uncle. Gertrude and the King married approximately a month or two after the funeral. At this point it’s not actually established what the cause of his actions is. Was Hamlet at fault for Polonius’s

5.04 Sinclair Snoop for Scoop Free Essays

5. 04 Sinclair: Snoop for Scoop! Part I: 1. Sinclair â€Å"muckrake† for social reform, by uncovering the terrible working conditions people in the meat industries were experiencing. We will write a custom essay sample on 5.04 Sinclair: Snoop for Scoop or any similar topic only for you Order Now After uncovering these terrible conditions Sinclair then wrote â€Å"The Jungle† which made the public aware of the terrible unsanitary working conditions in the meat industry. Soon after, Americans demanded better regulations for the meat industry. 2. The Pure Food and Drug Act was established as a direct result of the public outcry from Sinclair novel â€Å"The Jungle†. 3. As a result of his novel Sinclair wanted to opened the public eyes to the terrible working conditions people were experiencing and how the meat products were being produced. In this he hoped to see changes in meat productions such as healthier productions and working conditions. Sinclair also wanted to help promote socialism. 4. Majority of the public was mortified that their meat was filled with contaminations wanted this problem to be fixed immediately. Some on the other hand saw Sinclair’s book as an exaggeration of what was really going on. Many people began to stop eating meat. 5. ABC News found that the conditions at Food Lion was mortifing. Food Lion was selling food that was rotten washed them with bleach to get rid of the ordor. They also found cheese that was being gnawed at by rats. . Food Lion could not prove the findings were false. 7. The basis of Food Lion’s lawsuit against ABC-News was that they were charged with fraud ,trespassing, and breach of duty. 8. In the jury’s verdict they ruled against ABC News 9. The jurors’ rationale for the verdict was that Food Lion Lion food recieved twice the amount as compensation for wages paid to producers because the jurors’ believed ABC didn’t have to lie to get the information about Food Lion Part II: I do believe journalists have a duty to be â€Å"watchdogs† for the public, but to a certain instinct. I say this because although it is apart of their profession if being a so called â€Å"watchdog† for the public means breaking morals laws then it shouldn’t be done. But then again I feel that we have to be our own â€Å"watchdogs† inorder to know what’s really going on. I’m not sure of the name of the person who post I responded to, but the date of the post I replied to was on Thu Oct 11 09:36:35 2012 How to cite 5.04 Sinclair: Snoop for Scoop, Papers 5.04 Sinclair Snoop for Scoop Free Essays 5. 04 Sinclair: Snoop for Scoop! Part I: 1. Sinclair â€Å"muckrake† for social reform, by uncovering the terrible working conditions people in the meat industries were experiencing. We will write a custom essay sample on 5.04 Sinclair: Snoop for Scoop or any similar topic only for you Order Now After uncovering these terrible conditions Sinclair then wrote â€Å"The Jungle† which made the public aware of the terrible unsanitary working conditions in the meat industry. Soon after, Americans demanded better regulations for the meat industry. 2. The Pure Food and Drug Act was established as a direct result of the public outcry from Sinclair novel â€Å"The Jungle†. 3. As a result of his novel Sinclair wanted to opened the public eyes to the terrible working conditions people were experiencing and how the meat products were being produced. In this he hoped to see changes in meat productions such as healthier productions and working conditions. Sinclair also wanted to help promote socialism. 4. Majority of the public was mortified that their meat was filled with contaminations wanted this problem to be fixed immediately. Some on the other hand saw Sinclair’s book as an exaggeration of what was really going on. Many people began to stop eating meat. 5. ABC News found that the conditions at Food Lion was mortifing. Food Lion was selling food that was rotten washed them with bleach to get rid of the ordor. They also found cheese that was being gnawed at by rats. . Food Lion could not prove the findings were false. 7. The basis of Food Lion’s lawsuit against ABC-News was that they were charged with fraud ,trespassing, and breach of duty. 8. In the jury’s verdict they ruled against ABC News 9. The jurors’ rationale for the verdict was that Food Lion Lion food recieved twice the amount as compensation for wages paid to producers because the jurors’ believed ABC didn’t have to lie to get the information about Food Lion Part II: I do believe journalists have a duty to be â€Å"watchdogs† for the public, but to a certain instinct. I say this because although it is apart of their profession if being a so called â€Å"watchdog† for the public means breaking morals laws then it shouldn’t be done. But then again I feel that we have to be our own â€Å"watchdogs† inorder to know what’s really going on. I’m not sure of the name of the person who post I responded to, but the date of the post I replied to was on Thu Oct 11 09:36:35 2012 How to cite 5.04 Sinclair: Snoop for Scoop, Essay examples

Philosophy Kants Universal L Essay Example For Students

Philosophy Kants Universal L Essay Kantian philosophy outlines the Universal Law Formation of theCategorical Imperative as a method for determining morality of actions. This formula is a two part test. First, one creates a maxim andconsiders whether the maxim could be a universal law for all rationalbeings. Second, one determines whether rational beings would will it tobe a universal law. Once it is clear that the maxim passes both prongsof the test, there are no exceptions. As a paramedic faced with adistraught widow who asks whether her late husband suffered in hisaccidental death, you must decide which maxim to create and based on thetest which action to perform. The maxim when answering a widowsinquiry as to the nature and duration of her late husbands death, oneshould always tell the truth regarding the nature of her late husbandsdeath (M1) passes both parts of the Universal Law Formation of theCategorical Imperative. Consequently, according to Kant, M1 is a moralaction. The initial stage of the Universal Law Formation of the CategoricalImperative requires that a maxim be universally applicable to allrational beings. M1 succeeds in passing the first stage. We can easilyimagine a world in which paramedics always answer widows truthfully whenqueried. Therefore, this maxim is logical and everyone can abide by itwithout causing a logical impossibility. The next logical step is toapply the second stage of the test. The second requirement is that a rational being would will this maximto become a universal law. In testing this part, you must decide whetherin every case, a rational being would believe that the morally correctaction is to tell the truth. First, it is clear that the widow expectsto know the truth. A lie would only serve to spare her feelings if shebelieved it to be the truth. Therefore, even people who would considerlying to her, must concede that the correct and expected action is totell the truth. By asking she has already decided, good or bad, that shemust know the truth. What if telling the truth brings the widow to the point where shecommits suicide, however? Is telling her the truth then a moral actionalthough its consequence is this terrible response? If telling thewidow the truth drives her to commit suicide, it seems like no rationalbeing would will the maxim to become a universal law. The suicide is,however, a consequence of your initial action. The suicide has nobearing, at least for the Categorical Imperative, on whether telling thetruth is moral or not. Likewise it is impossible to judge whether uponhearing the news, the widow would commit suicide. Granted it is apossibility, but there are a multitude of alternative choices that shecould make and it is impossible to predict each one. To decide whetherrational being would will a maxim to become a law, the maxim itself mustbe examined rationally and not its consequences. Accordingly, the maximpasses the second test. Conversely, some people might argue that in telling the widow a lie,you spare her years of torment and suffering. These supporters of whitelies feel the maxim should read, When facing a distraught widow, youshould lie in regards to the death of her late husband in order to spareher feelings. Applying the first part of the Universal Law Formation ofthe Categorical Imperative, it appears that this maxim is a moral act. Certainly, a universal law that prevents the feelings of people who arealready in pain from being hurt further seems like an excellentuniversal law. Unfortunately for this line of objection, the only reasona lie works is because the person being lied to believes it to be thetruth. In a situation where every widow is lied to in order to spare herfeelings, then they never get the truth. This leads to a logicalcontradiction because no one will believe a lie if they know it a lieand the maxim fails. .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 , .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .postImageUrl , .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 , .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:hover , .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:visited , .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:active { border:0!important; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:active , .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715 .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u7346ccd9aff74c3c4bb369b82f94e715:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Medea By Euripides EssayPerhaps the die-hard liar can regroup and test a narrower maxim. If itis narrow enough so that it encompasses only a few people, then itpasses the first test. For example, the maxim could read, When facing adistraught widow whose late husband has driven off a bridge at night,and he struggled to get out of the car but ended up drowning, and he waswearing a brown suit and brown loafers, then you should tell the widowthat he died instantly in order to spare her feelings. We can easilyimagine a world in which all paramedics lied to widows in this specificsituation. That does not necessarily mean that it will pass the second testhowever. Even if it does pass the first test, narrowing down maxim cancreate other problems. For instance circumstances may change and thepeople who were originally included in the universal law, may not beincluded anymore. Consequently you many not want to will your maxim tobe a universal law. Likewise, if one person can make these maxims thatinclude only a select group of people, so can everyone else. If youcreate a maxim about lying to widows that is specific enough to pass thefirst test, so can everyone else. One must ask if rational beings wouldreally will such a world in which there would be many, many specific,but universal, laws. In order to answer this question, one must use therational I for the statement I, as a rational being would will such aworld, not the specific, embodied I which represents you in yourpresent condition. You must consider that you could be the widow in thesituation rather than the paramedi c, then decide whether you would willsuch a universal law. I agree with the morality based on Kantian principles because it isstrict in its application of moral conduct. Consequently there is novacillating in individual cases to determine whether an action is moralor not. An action is moral in itself not because of its consequences butbecause any rational being wills it to be a universal law and it doesnot contradict itself. Regardless of what the widow does with theinformation, the act of telling her the truth, is a moral one. No onewould argue that telling the truth, if she asks for it, is an immoralthing to do. Sometimes moral actions are difficult, and perhaps in thissituation it would be easier to lie to the widow, but it would still bean immoral action that I would not want everyone to do. This picture ofmorality resonates with my common sense view of morality. If the widowsubsequently commits suicide or commits any other immoral act as aconsequence, that has no bearing on the morality of the original actionin itself. Utilitarianism would differ on this point. Utilitarianism outlines thatan action is moral if it increases the total happiness of society. Morality is based on consequences. Telling a lie to the widow wouldincrease her happiness and consequently would, at least possibly, be amoral action. Utilitarianism would also take into account the precedentset by lying; however, the analysis still rests on predicted consequencerather than on the actions intrinsic moral value. The morality oftelling the lie is on a case by case basis. In some situations, it mightbe better to tell the truth, and according to utilitarianism that wouldthen be the moral action. Unlike Kantian philosophy, one is not bound byan immutable universal law. Instead one must judge in each case whichaction will produce the most overall happiness. The problem with thisapproach is that morality loses any value as a universal or intrinsicquality. Every decision is made on an individual basis in an individualand specific situation. In fact, utilitarianism considers happiness tobe the only intrinsically valuable end. .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf , .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .postImageUrl , .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf , .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:hover , .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:visited , .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:active { border:0!important; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:active , .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf499ba585de5d8e2909a3dd6fc64c9cf:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Personal: The Yemin Order Project EssayDefenders of utilitarianism claim that it maintains universality byconsidering the greatest happiness of all beings, rather than justindividual happiness. Still, the morality is based on constantlychanging and often unpredictable consequences. The requirement that oneconsider all of the consequences of an action and determine the bestpossible action through such calculations makes me reject utilitarianismas a method of determining morality. Although utilitarianism often offers the easier solution to performbecause it produces immediate gratification and allows many exceptionsto common sense moral codes, the answers it gives are unfill ing andunrealistic. Furthermore, it is difficult, if not impossible, to makeall of the required calculations beforehand. Kants solution, althoughas interpreted by Kant is sometimes overly extreme, is much better thanutilitarianism. It resonates with my moral sensibilities to considerthat actions are moral or immoral regardless of their immediateconsequences. I am willing to accept that sometimes the moral action isharder to perform, but I am unwilling to accept that morality restswithin the specifics of a situation and the possible consequences. Therefore, I consider Kants Universal Law Formation of the CategoricalImperative to be a better test of morality than Mills Utilitarianism.